• Tanya S Osensky

Arbitration isn't always the best option

Recently my client showed me her standard form customer agreement which required that all disputes be resolved by mandatory arbitration. This is very common in contracts. Unfortunately, she got a taste of arbitration last year and she was frustrated because she found arbitration to be just as expensive and time-consuming as litigation. Arbitration is not always a practical way to handle every type of dispute. I revised her contract to add more flexibility, with negotiation and mediation for some types of minor disputes, resorting to arbitration only for the most important issues. I also changed it to minimize the expense of any future arbitration. I don't know about you, but I hate surprises in business. Have you ever had a project take longer than expected? A contract is a great tool to build in more predictability.

Recent Posts

See All

Julie is a business consultant who got into a bad spot with a client. The client has gone silent, won’t respond to calls or emails and hasn’t paid the last invoice. Julie is not sure what’s wrong exac

Victor was working as a 1099 contractor on a large-scale engineering project when his client said he must attend an HR training workshop given to all the client’s employees. I advised against it. Why?

Contracts. Root canal. For a lot of people, it would be hard to choose which they'd rather avoid more. When I was in law school, I dreaded the contracts class. It was mind-numbing, I thought. I never